Constitutional Revolution, Ltd
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
the constitutional revolution: social evolution or democratic revolution
this paper seeks to answer the question whether the constitutional revolution of 1905-1911 in iran was a democratic revolution or social revolution? this discussion has been explained from the view point of the political sociology, relying on the moore's theory. studies indicate that the constitutional revolution in all periods has had the features of democratic revolution for the followin...
متن کاملassessing orientation of painting system through constitutional revolution era
considering native modernism existence, iranian constitutional revolution can be contemplated as an exordium for cultural transition because constitutionalism movement played a significant role in transferring modern concepts to iran. this kind of perception about modernism oversees the experimental and practical events, and also provides the opportunity to survey art system shift in the contex...
متن کاملrole of azerbaijan in the iranian constitutional revolution
historical role of azerbaijan in developing of intellectual thought and revolutionary ideas before the constitutional revolution of iran (1905-1906) is certain. resistance of the people of tabriz, in the blockade of tabriz accompanied with the concrete of tehran by constitutionalists, which were from turk and shomali ethnics lead by bakhtiari lurs. thinking the constitutional revolution, this q...
متن کاملConstitutional Theory, Constitutional Culture
Constitutional theorists and other constitutional commentators make heavy use of a paradigm that mistakes certain aspects of our current constitutional decisionmaking process for inherent parts of our constitutional structure and ignores other important aspects of that process entirely. These distortions and elisions raise concerns about the accuracy of much descriptive constitutional commentar...
متن کاملAfter the Revolution: Somerset and the Antislavery Tradition in Anglo-American Constitutional Development
Lord Chief Justice Mansfield declared in Somerset v. Stewart (1772) that the nature of slavery is ‘‘so odious . . . nothing can be suffered to support it but positive law.’’ In this essay, I trace the principle laid down in Somerset through several cases that occurred during the first quarter of the nineteenth century, and I pay particular attention to two conservative judicial opinions in the ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Yale Law Journal
سال: 1941
ISSN: 0044-0094
DOI: 10.2307/792572